+86-24-88816868

ᱤᱱᱴᱚᱨᱱᱮᱴ ᱠᱚ! ᱭᱩᱨᱚᱯᱤᱭᱟᱱ ᱭᱩᱱᱤᱭᱚᱱ ᱫᱚ "ᱟᱢᱮᱨᱤᱠᱟᱱ ᱠᱚ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ ᱵᱟᱝ ᱴᱷᱤᱠ ᱜᱮᱭᱟ" ᱤ-ᱠᱚᱢᱟᱨᱥ ᱦᱚᱛᱮᱛᱮ ᱚᱞ ᱟᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱾

Dec 06, 2018

2006 ᱥᱟᱞᱟᱜ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ, SEC, "Revertions", "Testruction official official official official official" ᱫᱚ "Aboptions", ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸ ᱨᱮ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱜᱟᱱ ᱯᱨᱚᱜᱚᱨᱢ ᱠᱚ ᱥᱮᱞᱮᱫ ᱢᱮᱱᱟᱜ-ᱟ, ᱚᱱᱟ ᱫᱚ "ᱞᱟᱛᱟᱨ ᱨᱮ, ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱠᱚ ᱥᱟᱶ ᱥᱟᱶᱛᱮ ᱠᱚ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ." ᱧᱩᱛᱩᱢ ᱫᱚ {}}}᱾


 


ᱵᱽᱨᱮᱠ ᱫᱚ ᱵᱟᱝ ᱯᱩᱨᱟᱹᱣ ᱫᱟᱲᱮᱭᱟᱜᱼᱟ ᱾


Gobers official ar khon khon jạruṛak̕ kạmi lạgit̕, "Roshime" ᱫᱚ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱛᱤ ᱠᱚ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ, ᱟᱨ ᱟᱭᱢᱟ ᱥᱮᱨᱢᱟ ᱨᱮ, ᱟᱨ ᱟᱭᱢᱟ ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ "Anders" ᱠᱚ ᱵᱮᱱᱟᱣ ᱠᱮᱫᱟ, ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸ ᱫᱚ "Cource", "Cource , houtions, ᱟᱨ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱜᱮ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱤᱡ ᱜᱮᱭᱟ." ᱢᱮᱴᱨᱤᱠᱥ ᱟᱨ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱰᱟᱴᱟ ᱠᱚ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱜᱚᱲᱦᱚᱱ ᱟᱨ ᱢᱮᱴᱨᱤᱠᱥ ≤ −66


ᱟᱥᱟ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱡᱮ 3000 ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱛᱤ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱠᱚᱢ ᱜᱮᱭᱟ, ᱟᱨ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱜᱟᱱ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱠᱚ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱟᱨ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱛᱤ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱡᱟᱹᱨᱩᱲ ᱜᱮᱭᱟ. ᱧᱩᱛᱩᱢ ᱠᱚ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱵᱤᱵᱨᱚᱬ ᱠᱚ}}᱾


UK ᱨᱮ, UNPs ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ APIs ᱟᱨ UFC ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ "Stations" ᱠᱚ ᱵᱮᱵᱚᱦᱟᱨ ᱠᱮᱫᱟ, ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸ ᱫᱚ APIs ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ "Stations" ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ "Seard official office" ᱠᱚ ᱩᱫᱩᱜ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ.


"China Rubber" learned that the European Commission's investigation team firmly retained the opposite view. They have included retreaded tires in the scope from beginning to end. They think that although there may be differences in the production process, the products they ultimately get. Basically the same, it is not necessary to conduct a separate investigation of retreaded tires.


Mlex commented that, in spite of this, in the previous merger case, the committee considered new tires and retreaded tires as different products when dealing with cases involving no retread tire manufacturers, and some Chinese manufacturers considered the investigators accordingly. It is not reasonable to impose tariffs.


 


ᱰᱤᱡᱤᱴᱟᱭᱤᱡᱽ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ ᱮᱢ ᱟᱠᱟᱱ ᱡᱤᱱᱤᱥ ᱠᱚ


ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱪᱷᱟᱰᱟ ᱠᱟᱛᱮ, USDA ᱫᱚ ᱱᱤᱛ ᱦᱟᱹᱵᱤᱡ ᱛᱮ ᱵᱮᱱᱟᱣ ᱟᱠᱟᱱᱟ, ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸ ᱫᱚ ᱪᱟᱭᱱᱟ ᱟᱨ ᱟᱢᱮᱨᱤᱠᱟ ᱥᱚᱨᱠᱟᱨ ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱜᱮ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱤᱡ ᱠᱚ ᱵᱩᱡᱷᱟᱹᱣ ᱫᱟᱲᱮᱭᱟᱜ-ᱟ ᱡᱮ ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱤᱡ ᱜᱮᱭᱟ᱾


Mlex said that Chinese tire manufacturers can still hold investigators' decisions in measuring some important data related to European SMEs, because in this case, SMEs are mostly refurbished tire companies, while large enterprises Most are manufacturers of new tires.


ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱦᱚᱸ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱛᱤ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ 15 ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱛᱤ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱛᱤ ᱰᱟᱴᱟ ᱠᱚ ᱧᱟᱢ ᱠᱮᱫᱟ ᱟᱨ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱰᱟᱴᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱥᱟᱹᱨᱤ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱠᱚ ᱧᱟᱢ ᱠᱮᱫᱟ ᱚᱠᱟ ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ ᱥᱟᱹᱨᱤ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱛᱤ ᱠᱚ ᱧᱟᱢ ᱠᱮᱫᱟ᱾


But in fact, the result of the case is that the investigators gave the SMEs more weight in the survey database, which is said to be used to describe other small companies that cannot be sampled. These data immediately became the tire industry. Part of the evidence of unfair price damage. In other words, the basis for the decision of the organizing committee in the case is the investigation report of the changed data weight.


ᱢᱮᱠᱥᱤᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱠᱚ ᱵᱟᱰᱟᱭ ᱠᱮᱫᱟ ᱡᱮ ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱠᱚ ᱫᱚ "Structions" ᱟᱨ ᱩᱱᱠᱩ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱠᱚᱣᱟᱜ ᱥᱚᱞᱦᱟ ᱠᱚ ᱮᱢ ᱠᱮᱫᱟ, ᱚᱱᱟ ᱛᱮ ᱩᱱᱠᱩ ᱫᱚ ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱠᱚ ᱞᱟᱹᱭ ᱠᱮᱫᱟ ᱡᱮ ᱩᱱᱠᱩ ᱫᱚ "Cocke 19" ᱠᱚ ᱵᱮᱱᱟᱣ ᱠᱮᱫᱟ᱾


2002 ᱥᱟᱞᱦᱟ ᱨᱮ, 2009 ᱥᱟᱞᱟᱜ ᱢᱩᱪᱟᱹᱫ ᱨᱮ, ᱟᱨ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱛᱟᱭᱚᱢ ᱫᱚ ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱠᱚᱢ ᱜᱮᱭᱟ, ᱚᱱᱟ ᱛᱮ ᱩᱱᱠᱩ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱠᱚᱣᱟᱜ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱠᱚ ᱯᱩᱨᱟᱹᱣ ᱠᱮᱫᱟ, ᱚᱱᱟ ᱛᱮ ᱩᱱᱠᱩ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱠᱚᱢ ᱜᱮ ᱠᱚ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ, ᱟᱨ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱛᱟᱭᱚᱢ ᱫᱚ ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱤᱡ ᱠᱚ ᱵᱩᱡᱷᱟᱹᱣ ᱫᱟᱲᱮᱭᱟᱜ-ᱟ᱾ ᱱᱮᱴᱯᱷᱞᱤᱠᱥ ᱫᱚ ᱖᱕ ᱥᱟᱹᱨᱤ ᱜᱮ ᱧᱟᱢ ᱟᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱾


ᱟᱢ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱵᱟᱢ ᱠᱩᱥᱤᱭᱟᱜ-ᱟ

ᱤᱱᱴᱮᱜᱽᱨᱮᱥᱚᱱ